Metrics Dashboard
Analytical scope
Are we testing what we planned to test, and what is driving laboratory cost?
Rush target < 10%
Analytical spend
$2.3M
of $2M budget
Analytical budget variance
$244K
+12.0% vs budget
Samples submitted
1,898
1,830 planned in SOW
Rush / premium spend
$268.4K
4.7% of analytical spend
Out-of-package add-on spend
$44K
82 samples
Scope adherence
96.4%
Planned versus actual analytical scope
Approved SOW scope beside what was actually submitted, by project.
Spend by analyte group
Laboratory spend per configured package.
Turnaround mix
Regular versus rush samples by project, so premium spend is traceable.
Analytical spend trend
Actual against budget over time, thousands CAD.
Projects driving analytical variance
Planned against actual scope, with the premium and add-on spend behind each variance.
| Project | Planned samples | Actual samples | Budget | Actual spend | Rush spend | Add-on spend | Variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chinchaga 8-30 Delineation | 210 | 262 | $138K | $168.9K | $41.2K | $18.4K | +22.4% |
| Fox Creek 14-22 PSI | 130 | 148 | $82K | $96.4K | $28.4K | $9.6K | +17.6% |
| Gold Creek 11-4 PSI | 98 | 112 | $54K | $61.3K | $8.9K | $4.2K | +13.5% |
| Simonette 2-7 Risk Screen | 132 | 158 | $78K | $88.2K | $24.6K | $11.8K | +13.1% |
| Kaybob South 3-11 DSA | 104 | 96 | $56K | $52.1K | $3.2K | - | -7.0% |
| Wapiti 6-19 Reclamation Cert | 48 | 44 | $21K | $18.6K | - | - | -11.4% |
Out-of-package add-ons
Additional analyses outside the approved package, and why they were requested.
| Project | Add-on samples | Add-on spend | Primary reason | Scope status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fox Creek 14-22 PSI | 18 | $9.6K | PAHs added on observed sheen | Watch |
| Chinchaga 8-30 Delineation | 34 | $18.4K | Step-out salinity beyond approved grid | Investigate |
| Gold Creek 11-4 PSI | 8 | $4.2K | Dissolved metals added at MW-02 | Watch |
| Simonette 2-7 Risk Screen | 22 | $11.8K | PAH confirmation for risk pathway | Investigate |